NATO says shaheds in Poland was “not an attack.”
Strange. When drones drift into Belarus by mistake NO HOMES are hit. But this one went straight into a residential building.
Coincidence? No. A deliberate strike. A test for Poland. A test for NATO. 🔽
Replies
-
ukrainians want NATO to join the war, it's most understandable
but we're in no hurry to do that (but we're preparing anyway)
we have good diplomats
-
In 2022, we in Ukraine also believed it wasn’t on purpose. After 3.5 years, we know: russians always aim for civilians first.
-
They just dropped in for a coffee . Nato is pathetic .
-
Exactly. Explain this map (from The Telegraph) as anything but a deliberate attack, given that the drones in question had to come from either Belarus or Kaliningrad. They were NOT headed for Ukraine.
-
And Poland has invoked NATO Article 4, a precursor to Article 5 if anything else untoward happens on Polish soil or airspace!
-
Of course it was a Ruzzian attack to test resilience. However, if NATO had called it an attack, a response would have been necessary. By downplaying it, they avoided that. Is it wise or is it cowardly? Will NATO respond in another way? Time will tell.
-
But Poland does call it an act of aggression. The advantage of pjutin and troomp is they can act without asking anybody anything. EU and NATO must coordinate the way out of confusion.
