Yeah, there is no clear admission of performing a "soft succession", but what's being used to imply that this is happening are the verifiable State actions that are being coordinated against federal government initiatives and statements. It is similarly not necessary for people to state 2+2=4
Ok, but the close coordination, recurring calls, off-the-shelf briefs ready to go and etc are pretty specific claims (and fantastic if true!), but there is no tangible support for it anywhere in the article
Replies
-
"Democratic attorneys general led more than 130 multistate lawsuits against the administration and won 83 percent of them."
I understand the desire for 100% certainty, but it is unnecessary when we can engage in critical analysis.