I’m working on a paper right now arguing that we shouldn’t use AI in the classroom because it’s dehumanizing. The problem I’m facing is it’s patently obvious in a way that makes describing it in academic writing terribly difficult.
There’s a number of things that I would’ve said in Nov 2022 that are so patently counterproductive they could go with saying and someone isn’t there advocating for all of them, e.g. AI “peer review” for one of many.
Replies
-
Oh, I’m definitely writing the paper. I’m just lamenting that USE YOUR FUCKING EYES AND EARS will never make it past peer review.