That would imply the executive could "suspend" the laws, which is something that the English Declaration of Rights of 1688 and our own Declaration of Independence both rejected, atop their list of grievances against James II and George III.
In any case, the title of the essay makes no sense as a causal statement. Disagreements about the implications of the Vesting Clause have been there from the outset. The real problem is to explain is the feckless behavior of other institutions facing this challenge.
Replies
-
Congressional Republicans for their craven, supine behavior. Congressional Democrats, or at least their leaders, for an ineffective counter-strategy. The Supreme Court majority for choosing a narrow proceduralism to confronting the dimensions of this attack on the Constitution.