Sydney Sweeney has become a beacon for thorny public discourse for her work in ad campaigns, most recently with American Eagle. But why does the actress, who has two Emmy Award nominations and has been featured in a number of films and TV shows, need to lend her face to so many brands?
The actress seems to be everywhere, fronting dozens of ad campaigns, and has lately become a beacon for thorny public discourse.
Money?
Ummm…$$$$$$$$$
No one represents more goods than Shaq....
Because she is smart and knows that women in Hollywood have a shelf life. Hollywood likes them on the younger side. Are young male celebrities ever this scrutinized?
Is the Times going to compensate her for missing out on income?
Wut? Who approves these articles? Seriously. You think Emmy noms means wealth and success that can last a lifetime? You think she doesn’t know she won’t look like that forever and how Hollywood tends to treat older actresses? She’s in ads now cuz she can be.
What’s a synonym for obtuse? The NYT.
Because an actresses career has a shelf life and one must strike while the iron is hot.
Parent passing down their genes is a fact. And they can also pay for plastic surgery.
Money, hope that helps.
The same reason anyone does. They are trying to make a living in this capitalist hellscape that your publication has helped to create.
The real question is why are you writing articles about this and not actually important shit?
Because she wants to make money so she can have a more comfortable life if her career falters?
Does the NYT often write about extremely successful men in what are likely their peak earning years, hustling to make the most of that opportunity, and asking "why does he need to work so much?"
This is a stupid controversy. If Gabrielle Union was in this ad, I wouldn’t think anything of it saying good jeans. I wouldn’t find it offensive.
Hey NYT?
WHO WRITES THIS DRECK? 🖕🏽🖕🏽🖕🏽🖕🏽🖕🏽🖕🏽🖕🏽🖕🏽🖕🏽
Because Hollywood is sexist as hell and women have to make their money while they’re young and hot before they’re cast off for the next hot 20-something. What a stupid question NYT.
Inescapable because her PR team has gullible marks at places like NYT to churn out a few thousand words of thought shaped piffle. "What Does This Say About Us?" ask the NYT in a trenchant flurry of piffle.
Money
I don't know for sure, but I'm going to assume they pay her for these ads. I'll look into it and get back to you.
"thorny"
almost there
Because she wants to? Why are creepy men creeping on a woman who is just doing her job?
Why shouldn’t she?
I was struck by the way “some social media users” who’ve detected a Nazi-race-science-adjacent vibe in these ads had metamorphosed into “the current Democratic Party” by the time I got to the readers’ comments. So now a handful of superwoke TikTokkers are the revolutionary vanguard of the party?
This is always the correct answer:
You really have to be born yesterday to assume an A-list celebrity would share any sort of punk rock ethos on consumerism.
$
How bad has journalism become, it’s hard to tell the difference between a @nytimes.com or Facebook BS stories. It’s to point of embarrassment. Independent journalism is the future.
Why can’t you be normal
Honestly. Never heard of her.
She's the Ultimate Capitalist™️. Being a party favor at the Bezos wedding does make her somewhat distasteful...but you do you, girl. Get that coin. 🤮
yeah with the beginning she's from some kind of right wing kook family so we should forget about all this lady;s noise
Can’t blame her for striking while the iron’s hot.
$$$$$$
Who can $ay
This is what women want...
Not more sexy pictures...
no idea who she is, never shopped at anything she sell, but thanks for trying to make her even more noticeable
I think
I believe it's called money
