Replies

  1. If ice agents are acting legally they shouldn't be covering their faces like criminals do

    3
  2. Good, they need to be revealed! Since they are so proud of their service, shouldn’t the be recognized? 🤷🏾‍♀️

    0
  3. Interesting how they only care about safety if they are referring to ICE agents.

    0
  4. Homeland Security is ignoring the fact that some of these "agents" are not in fact ICE agents but rather bounty hunters who cosplay as agents. They deserve to be exposed, doxed, and held to account.

    That's Home Security's problem not ours.

    0
  5. Great. And why would Washington want to anything about? Oh, you mean the fascist regime.

    0
  6. washington can do something about it. make it obsolete. Better this than the fucking govt or contractors using AI to find trans people, or people seeking abortions. The framing of this is fucked.

    0
  7. 1mkk.bsky.social profile picture

    @1mkk.bsky.social

    Alleged ICE agents have started using masks and disguises while refusing to show identification or badges, sparking new concerns about citizen safety.

    0
  8. Well maybe no one would do this if the alleged agents provided proper credentials and warrants.

    0
  9. “unmasking project is part of a broader online campaign, the ICE List, that has published the names of more than 100 ICE employees, from field agents to back-office bureaucrats” - you don’t get to hide while terrorizing other humans.

    0
  10. If the headline writer actually believed in transparent governance - that the armed branch of the government should not go anonymous,that secret police are a bad idea - that headline would be radically different.

    0
  11. Well, that sounds like one actual benefit of AI. We will need to identify them for the trials afterward.

    0
  12. They should not be masked to begin with. Why? Because they know they are not operating within the law. Good for AI.

    0
  13. Keep the receipts. These people don’t have enough time to blow it all up and elections will ensure they pay for every law they break. No Republicans can ever be allowed as President to hand out pardons again. Criminals must and will pay.

    0
  14. Well , since doxing a federal agent happens to be a federal crime , but nevermind the law politico

    0
  15. If they don't want to be treated as gestapo scum, than they shouldn't have deliberately chosen to be gestapo scum.

    0
  16. Weird how AI is good when it's used to find "mortgage fraud" by perceived enemies of Trump, but bad when it's used against his regime to out his brownshirts... er, ICE.

    0
  17. Politico, you're having a shit day for POV on your posts.

    First, suggesting Germany is mirroring Nazi Germany.

    Now, trying to say AI has gone too far because... ICE is melting?

    Your third time today will most likely be rivaling @nytpitchbot.bsky.social in its absurdity.

    Get your shit together. 💯

    2
  18. They shouldn’t ever be masked and we should know theirs. Fucking around like they are has consequences. It’s only a matter of time until we know these POS are.

    0
  19. Um yeah. I hope they can't do a thing about it. That person unmasking those gestapo thugs is a hero.

    3
  20. ehansen.io profile picture

    E is me @ehansen.io

    Probably not. With the clowns they have left over there. Fealty to Trump got them the job but doesn’t much help when it comes to actual work.

    0
  21. Fuck ICE, they deserve whatever they get, but there's no way that this technology is reliable.

    0
  22. Wasn't ICE spotted doing the same on their phones to protesters? Well, if it isn't the consequence of my own actions.

    Nice twisting the narrative that people are the ones in the wrong, after ICE is doing this beforehand.

    0
  23. And this runs the risk of false positives. Same as when law enforcement uses it. And it's more likely to misidentify minorities based on flawed training data. Curious how law enforcement didn't really care about false positives. Until now.

    1
  24. They need to be identified if only to be sure they are actual agents & not some imposter

    0
  25. They know their actions are unconstitutional, they better be prepared for the trials

    0
  26. A Blackburn spokesperson said she is against the public’s use of computer-assisted facial recognition to identify ICE officials but supports police use of the technology.<

    Seems like a better question would be, "Can citizens be allowed to do things that Washington doesn't like?"

    0
  27. Maybe they shouldn't be masked to begin with Politico. Maybe they should also tell us their names and show their badges to identify them and even have a warrant before they detain anyone.

    0
  28. Can it do the same with the keffiyeh of pro-Pally Islamists hiding their faces to avoid accountability for domestic terrorism on American campuses?

    1
  29. I could care less what happens to any ICE agent. They get whatever they deserve.

    0
  30. In some videos the ICE person or "lawlessness enforcement" has threatened people with having their facial image and being able to find them. Many times its just a cell phone. Did the DOJ give all those goons an app on their phones?

    0
  31. I’m sure this tech will be as unreliable at this as it is with everything else people confidently use it for… 🤨

    1
  32. Well, damn. Something good from AI? All those data centers stealing art to train AI, raising our energy bills while making the filthy rich, richer, polluting our water and air, and taking jobs away from humans, but hey, unmask the bastards.

    1
  33. l2h2k.bsky.social profile picture

    Someone use AI please to prove that MTG was the democratic headquarters bomber

    0
  34. ID every damn one of them. If they are so proud of what they're doing, they should have no problem showing their faces. Only criminals and cowards feel the need to mask up and hide their faces to avoid detection.

    0
  35. Would politicians do anything to protect citizens from AI-powered surveillance? No. Would politicians do anything to protect their Gestapo shaped law enforcement agencies from AI-powered surveillance? Absolutely.

    0
  36. Turnabout is fair play. They are using the same technology to target those opposed to their Gestapo and SS techniques so they can beat the living shit out of them, in the name of Jesus.

    0
  37. Oops, you accidentally put "can" instead of "should", Politico. You should fix that error right away. 😏

    0
  38. Bruh you know for a fact the GOP Technofascists in power are all-in on AI deregulation. They won’t end up doing anything fair with AI regulation. If anything, it’ll be targeted, selective, biased, and hypocritical policy. Please make this known to those of the public who still don’t understand this.

    0
  39. It's good software to have if criminals wear a mask at a break in or robbery.

    ICE agents need to take off the masks and show some ID so we know they are real agents.

    0
  40. People who commit crimes with our tax dollars do not deserve anonymity you feckless chumps. I remember when the journalists' creed was something to do with "disturbing the comfortable."

    So much for that...

    0
  41. "Washington" isn't hiring and deploying the Gestapo, the GOP is. "Washington" would include Democratic lawmakers that are very much against masked Brownshirts kidnapping people. It's obvious which side Politico is on.

    0
  42. Using it on the general population? Fine. Using it to identify federal agents who should be easily identifiable while on the job? Problem.

    0
  43. I don't like this. AI cannot be trusted in any case. We shouldn't be supporting the use of surveillance and we could very easily see this used to accuse the wrong people. Remember the Boston Marathon shooting?

    0
  44. The real question is why democrats hate America and Americans so much they hope their own country fails? Obviously there is no coexistence between Americans and democrats.

    1
  45. WE ARE PAYING THEIR WAGES! We absolutely have the right to know who they are, where they come from and whether or not they have a criminal record. Unmask them! No matter how!

    0
  46. Focusing on the fascist thugs is a waste of time. The real targets should be Thiel, Musk, Murdoch etc

    1
  47. Why's this a issue?

    Sounds like a good use of the tech.

    After all how are people supposed to know that some random stranger in a mask is actually a government employee.

    Great idea, post addresses would be better.

    0
  48. Governments love using AI for stuff like facial recognition, so I suppose they don't like it when the same stuff's used on them in return.

    Funny, almost as if the surveillance tech was a bad idea in the first place.

    0
  49. YES!!! We need to identify those motherfuckers so their neighbors can tell them what they think

    0