That new usual suspects (Curry, Spencer, Christy, McKitrick, Koonin) Trump EPA climate denier report? (www.energy.gov/sites/defaul...)?
I asked chatGPT to evaluate it. It had no trouble producing a succinct and convincing refutation:
That new usual suspects (Curry, Spencer, Christy, McKitrick, Koonin) Trump EPA climate denier report? (www.energy.gov/sites/defaul...)?
I asked chatGPT to evaluate it. It had no trouble producing a succinct and convincing refutation:
Asked chatGPT & Claude: "๐๐ญ๐ฆ๐ข๐ด๐ฆ ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ต๐ข๐ฌ๐ฆ ๐ข ๐ค๐ณ๐ช๐ต๐ช๐ค๐ข๐ญ ๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ญ๐บ๐ด๐ช๐ด ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ข๐ต๐ต๐ข๐ค๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฑ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ต ๐ง๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฎ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ฑ๐ต. ๐ฐ๐ง ๐๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ณ๐จ๐บ ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ท๐ช๐ฅ๐ฆ ๐ข ๐ด๐ฉ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ต ๐ด๐ถ๐ฎ๐ฎ๐ข๐ณ๐บ ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ค๐ณ๐ช๐ต๐ช๐ฒ๐ถ๐ฆ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ช๐ต๐ด ๐ค๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ต๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต๐ด." I get the impression both are giving what I'd call ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐๐๐ฆ๐ง๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. Responses, GPT here, Claude to follow:
And here's Claude:
chatGPT has been programmed to push a both sides and light initial critique to please this political administration. If you keep asking chatGPT to go past political neutrality and give a โhard truthโ about things, it is less polite and admits to the initial programmed both siding.