Here we go again. The implication here is that the way AI generates its output is with human-like cognition. Which is untrue. "Cognitive capabilities humans have" is not the same is "outputs comparable to those of humans." www.theguardian.com/technology/2...
I'm not an expert in the biology, but I heard that the whole model of neural nets that AI tech is based upon is quite a bit outdated compared to what we now know is going on in the brain/body. Not sure however. Bit like saying the AI does modern psychology because it mentions Jungain ideas.
I took a class on cognitive psychology back in college where the professor said this. But, Mathematicians have a habit of proclaiming they're uniquely smarter than every other field so they kind of ignore advances in other fields they see as "lower".
Oh, there's no serious suggestion that AI works how the brain works. I mean, some people do believe that, but it's not a serious idea.
