Snow is, in the public's eyes, a trusted conveyor of historic information and this latest info will get far more traction with the public and be much more troglodyte resistant, than if it came from (with due respect) a random academic. Given the significance of the data I think this is a win

Replies

  1. He knows nothing whatsoever about the subject, had zero involvement with the project and clearly didn't know what he was talking about so just waffled and bullshitted. But apart from that, yeah, it was great. I'm sure the public were hugely enlightened.

    0