I did watch, and NO, he was not balanced. His targets for ridicule were usually conservatives, attacking conservative views. His most heated discussions were with people like Ann Coulter. I still remember him talking about Bush's test scores and getting into Yale. "If you actually watched..."
But guess what, he allowed for the other side. The other side was represented. You just said it, "Arguments with Ann Coulter"
Yes, he did allow for the other side to a small degree then. But he was in no way balanced as you stated. So when he had Eric Dyson(others as well) on to present a pro-Palestinian perspective, didn't he "allow for the other side," even though you claim he's one-sided?
