Okay that's legitimately a first I've seen for "Anthro content is bestiality" and I hope everybody whining about feral content will realize they're basically fucking it for everyone
⚠️ MAJOR UPDATES TO @fansly.com's POLICIES! #swresources #swsupport #fansly #censorship #creditcardcompanies
Cyber attack and hack them people
Kemomoni being allowed but not fursona implies they're bringing back the 'straight centre-of-gravity' metric for how animal something is
This seriously makes me mad… I hope other webs don't follow this or else other stuff will go down 2 like if 'fiction isn't fiction' to them, then it'd give free road to zealots bullying VAs like it happened on HH fandom once or prohibit star wars for being "alt ww2 in space" or shit like that sadly…
Sadly not the first I've seen an argument like that, but I've so far seen it from puritan dumbasses that argue anything not human enough is. ...which with arts and fiction is just dumb. lmao
Tip: they won't
THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS
My disgust is fucking through the roof. Whoever came up with this classification for "fansley" doesn't even have two braincells to rub together.
Fuck this sex negative era we live in.
I wish the Furry Fandom was filled with people who like Furries.
This has been the case on amazon for years now. Definitely more widespread, unfortunately. (Though does not make what is bring said true, of course.)
🎵 oh we’ll all go together when we go.. 🎶
Oh, this was totally a thing back in the 90s. Back then the line was drawn based on ability to consent, which was the defining feature. Over the last 10 years discourse has moved from consent and intent to “what things look like [to the loudest]”. Werewolves off the table now, Egyptian gods on watch
I see that folks have discovered this and I gotta say to get ahead of everyone
Folks I’ve been around for a decade plus and am a grizzled veteran of Discourse. I have seen it all.
...what even is this website that they need a "wrestling" guideline and a "no nudity in public spaces" guideline next to a "no fursonas (except anime style)" guideline?
Eeeyup.
What in the mother of fuck is "simulated bestiality"? That is literally saying it's not real bestiality, which isn't something worthy of a ban on content, so... they just threw in the word simulated to try and make it sound like they weren't just calling all Furry porn bestiality. Which they are.
looks like fansly is going down the typical patreon route. Happensnwith every site like that. It is a shame. within a year they will ban a bunch of other kinks and just kicking people off.
Fansly is still the outlier in targeting furry. And they all use the same payment processors so it’s not them.
Two months later, and none of the other platforms have gone so far as to specifically prohibit anthropomorphic content.
This is squarely on Fansly.
