@smileyhorse.bsky.social

5 days ago

Yep. Test ran it in October 3rd to 5th 24! (After Palantir was contracted to Voting Machine Maintenance and Calibration! Musks laser and DTC technology is undetectable if you aren’t looking for it when it is on!

AuntieU @umaija.bsky.social

5 days ago

Statisticians can see it, too. The voting data was rigged. When the turnout reached >60%, their algorithms kicked in to DELETE votes from Harris and to ADD votes to Felon47. That's why we get the crossover image (?? below). bsky.app/profile/elec...

Election Truth Alliance @electiontruthalliance.org

16 days ago

To put this very simply:

Parallel lines = Typical 👍 Crossing lines = RED FLAG 🚩

To learn more about Vote Share by Vote Count Analysis, see our Methodology page here: electiontruthalliance.org/our-methodol...

#VerifyTheVote #SecureTheMidterms #ElectionData101 #TruthMatters #TheMathAintMathin

Election Data 101: Vote Share by Vote Count presented by Election Truth Alliance .org Two graphs are presented from the 2024 election in Allegheny county, Pennsylvania. The first graph is Main-in votes and says "Candidate vote share typically averages out across precincts, reflecting a general community preference" The graph shows Democratic votes across all precincts averaging out to around 60% vote share, while the Republican votes average around 40%. Two parallel lines are drawn, along with a smilely face. The second graph is Election Day votes, in which Democratic and Republican votes begin high and low respectively until precinct vote count size increases, and their averages swap- creating an "X". It reads: "So why does one candidate benefit disproportionately here, in precincts where more votes were cast?"

Replies

@smileyhorse.bsky.social
5 days ago

I wonder what they are waiting for? Mid terms? If an Old Granny like me can work it out???

1