i wish i could have been in the room when they were brainstorming how to solve the housing crisis and someone raised their hand and said "what about 50 year mortgages?"

234

Replies

  1. Sadly, I think this was more insidious than stupid. They knew what it meant, more money for corporations and it's a way for them to get to claim they solved a crisis without really solving anything.

    1
  2. 50 yrs mortgage is bad for most people; but it could help those that cannot afford the monthly pmts of 15 or 30 yr mrtg. I am referring to the very young & the elderly. The young can take 50 yr mortgage until get a better job & refinance for a 15 yr mrtg. For the elderly is better than reverse mrtg

    1
  3. Japan had (has?) 100-year mortgages.

    (Canada has 5-year mortgages amortized over 25 years max. And if you pay off a fixed rate mortgage early (e.g. by refinancing), you pay a penalty.)

    0
  4. And then JD says "building on that, shouldn't we also consider how to blame housing prices on immigrants?"

    1
  5. Jokes them! I could finally buy a house at 59. Not gonna get that paid off in 50 yrs. Oh, and F them.

    0
  6. I saw it coming a decade ago. It's the only way to artificially have people afford monthly payments with house prices continuing to rise and not building enough housing.

    The next generation is going to revert to serfdom if they don't organize politically.

    0
  7. ‘In the last year the average age of a 1st time home buyer went up like 6 or 7 years, so we prob should spread the debt out well past the average lifetime’

    0
  8. I actually thought they must already exist because how else does any non-millionaire buy a house in California without dropping their entire salary on housing?

    1