Let me quickly add some slides about the Vienna circle, 20 minutes tops
Three hours later
frantically searching for a high-resolution photo of the inscription on the staircase where Moritz Schlick was shot
Julia M. Rohrer
@dingdingpeng.the100.ci
9754 Followers
2383 Following
Personality psych & causal inference @UniLeipzig. I like all things science, beer, & puns. Even better when combined! Part of http://the100.ci, http://openscience-leipzig.org
7 Days
Likes
90
Replies
8
Reposts
0
Quotes
2
Top 7 Day Skeets (Avg.)
Likes
18
Replies
1.6
Reposts
0
Quotes
0.4
This seems like a somewhat common patterns: somebody points out a fatal flaw in the central premise of a study and the authors respond “you don’t engage with our core finding” when the whole finding rests on the premise that was just illustrated to be flawed 🥲
Listening to some pop science book when suddenly Satoshi Kanazawa’s work is referenced in quite some detail—
"He [...] doesn’t talk about quantum evolution unless someone else brings it up first. There must be millions of people like him. Used car dealers with proofs of P=NP, dentists who think they’ve discovered something important about Mary Magdalene, math professors obsessed with destroying the moon."
In Search Of AI Psychosis
Folie a deux ex machina