Perhaps the very act of rewinding shows that there can never be a true ‘end,’ only recurring patterns.
Dr. Canan Çalışkan
@drcanancaliskan.bsky.social
206 Followers
48 Following
PhD in Social and Economic Sciences | Consultant | Interested in Society, Economy & Change
-
-
Schutz ja, aber auch Begleitung. Kinder brauchen Medienkompetenz statt nur Verbote. Eltern sollten mitreden, erklären, Grenzen setzen und selbst Vorbild sein, statt ständig am Handy zu hängen.
-
If you reduce homelessness to ‘crazy people on the street,’ you erase the real causes: poverty, lack of housing, and inadequate care. Talking about ‘our streets’ isn’t a solution it’s just scapegoating instead of addressing the problem.
JD Vance on homelessness: "I don't know why we accepted that it was reasonable to have crazy people yelling at our kids. You should not have to cross the street in downtown Atlanta to avoid a crazy person yelling at your family. Those are your streets."
-
If you reduce homelessness to ‘crazy people on the street,’ you erase the real causes: poverty, lack of housing, and inadequate care. Talking about ‘our streets’ isn’t a solution it’s just scapegoating instead of addressing the problem.
-
Maybe, but let’s make sure this left-wing jetliner doesn’t just fly like an eagle it better have a real flight plan. No more running off with the money or vanishing in a cloud of abracadabra. We need a Steve Miller with a policy manual.
-
Na klar, am besten in einem Rutsch, damit der Schock nicht nachlässt
Die muss man wahrscheinlich am Stück lesen.
-
Na klar, am besten in einem Rutsch, damit der Schock nicht nachlässt
-
No-the question isn’t whether he’s evil; it’s how cold and irresponsible his response is to legitimate concerns. Texas deserves answers, not gaslighting.
-
An interesting detail. If Iranian officials were internally surprised that the strikes caused less damage than expected, it suggests two things: the attacks were either limited or ineffective and the nuclear program is more resilient than many assumed. Strategically significant for all sides.
US signals intelligence picked up Iranian officials talking to each other — i.e. not communicating with the US nor putting on a show for their domestic audience — saying they thought the US bombing Iranian nuclear sites would've done more damage.
Yet more indication the nuclear program survived.
-
An interesting detail. If Iranian officials were internally surprised that the strikes caused less damage than expected, it suggests two things: the attacks were either limited or ineffective and the nuclear program is more resilient than many assumed. Strategically significant for all sides.
