Łink. @spacelawshitpost.me

1 month ago

So a trans man has to use the women’s toilet by law, but is also allowed to barred from the women’s toilet by law. How the fuck does that even make sense. Transphobia is so fucking ridiculous.

"A trans man might be excluded from the women-only service if the service provider decides that, because he presents as a man, other service users could reasonably object to his presence, and it is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim to exclude him".

Jessica Kant @jessdkant.bsky.social

1 month ago

The Times understands that the guidance is still being finalised and it will not decree that services have to provide single-sex spaces, but that if they do - for example if a lavatory is intended for women - transgender women would be excluded from using it. To allow someone of the opposite sex to use the facilities would be very likely to amount to unlawful discrimination.
It will also make clear that it will not be deemed as discrimination to exclude trans people from those facilities and that services will be allowed to request birth certificates to ensure single-sex services are protected.

It read: "A legitimate aim for excluding a trans person from a separate or single-sex service for their own biological sex might be to prevent alarm or distress for other service
users.
"A trans man might be excluded from the women-only service if the service provider decides that, because he presents as a man, other service users could reasonably object to his presence, and it is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim to exclude him".

Molly (they/them) 🏳️‍⚧️ @epi-nymph.bsky.social

1 month ago

They want to exclude us from public life altogether / have reasons to arrest and abuse us.

Replies

No replies yet