Even my students think the limitless attempts you have to seek an indictment makes them a low bar to prosecution. Eliminating them entirely?
John Parsi JD, PhD
@johnparsi.bsky.social
638 Followers
556 Following
Assistant Professor LSU Law - JD Michigan Law School & PhD Arizona State - Teaching Criminal Law, Constitutional Criminal Law, Health Law, Family Law, & Remedies
-
-
I wish that the Court’s misstatements and misapprehensions were minimal or isolated, but time and again they make egregious “errors” that justify the erosion of long established constitutional rights. They empower the tyrannical “majority” against the politically “unpopular.”
-
So long, and thanks for all the fishes!
-
This is precisely why I think breaking down these cases is essential. The Court is routinely either misstating or misapprehending the very evidence they are using to justify their legal conclusions. These are the types of “errors” we would not tolerate from law students or associates.
-
What’s so sinister about all of this is that it breads further distrust of the news from all sides, which is the point. Truth becomes irrelevant, propaganda triumphs.
-
My favorite city Baltimore, Illinois.
-
I came for the law professor jokes, and I was not disappointed.
-
Additionally, this is not a new issue. Renee Richard’s participated in the US Open in the 1977 after a court determined that “the unfounded fears and misconceptions of [the USTA and the USOC] must give way to the overwhelming medical evidence that this person is now female.”
-
More than it wants to spend on actual research at universities and research centers.
-
People forget his initial motivations with Facebook.