She reportedly conceived twins with the man who would become her third husband while married to her first. Got divorced. Married second husband. Divorced him to marry the father of the twins. Then divorced that guy to remarry the second husband. But yeah, perfect person to try to deny gay marriage.

Replies

  1. Because marriage is 'sacred' and is only legit between you and your serial affair partners of the opposite sex

    0
  2. Why judge her? Because she judges others? Don’t regulate love and marriage at all. Let people love who they love and get married if that’s what they want for themselves.

    0
  3. "Her marriage history delegitimizes my marriage between one man and one woman. "

    Isn't that the stupid claim they used to try to ban gay marriages? What someone else does ruins my marriage? Idiots!

    1
  4. Isn't this always the way, though? I want to know what short circuits in their brain to make them think that they are holier than thou living a lifestyle that is questionable and pointing the finger at somebody else's . How do they justify that in their little pea brains?

    0
  5. So on her 3rd husband but 4th marriage? Or would it be better to say on her 2nd husband but 4th marriage? At the point one has to ask that question, there isn’t much sanctity in her marriage history.

    0
  6. She’s a veritable icon to the sanctity of marriage…exceeding even Felon47, serial rapist and fornicator!

    0
  7. I’ve lost track! Maybe she shouldn’t have been allowed to get a license for the 3,4 or whatever, due to her adultery!

    2
  8. I bet each marriage and each divorce was for her to grab money. Marry for his money. Divorce for his alimony and child support. Repeat. These are the real “takers” that lives rent free off the backs of others. Not immigrants or poor people.

    0
  9. I don’t really know much about law and procedure at this high level of the Supreme Court

    But I feel like this fucked up story of botched marriages should be in an amicus brief that gets serious consideration.

    Like, even if you’re going to overturn precedent, maybe just toss this one and try again

    0