3403 Followers
2017 Following
I am a law professor. The Only Patent Habermasian. Dedicated to bringing a knife to a knife fight.
I'm excited that my next article, "The Administrative Law of McCarthyism," will be published in the Stanford Law Review. It explores how civil service law evolved in response to McCarthy era loyalty purges, and how courts drew on administrative law principles to fashion civil service protections.
My sister was like, that seems mean, Kali, and I was like a good 35% of me sticking it out through this ridiculous hazing was spite.
When I got tenure, I posted a Beyoncé gif and stated the best revenge is your papers.
I hate to be a mom, but maybe look at law school, www.nytimes.com/2025/08/10/t.... Data security and privacy law love computer science majors AND you can learn how to write? I hate to be a history-humanities major but cutting humanities misses their flexibility to respond to changing job markets.
Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson: Slayed, Boots Down, No Notes.
Did she shade the quality of the governmental briefs? Yes. Did she outline claims of informational injury? Yes. Did she link the database to Benjamin Franklin’s statement about the importance of public records to assess spending. Yes. Did she shade Russell Vought like Mariah Carey shades J. Lo. Yes.
Did I say I am obsessed about the English Civil War? Did I say I am obsessed with Infrostructure, which is government provide information? I am officially obsessed with Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson’s opinion requiring the return of a public database listing appropriated expenditures.
We have to find a method for law office history; adding this to the bibliography of the method of law office method.
Jonathan's book is an Xray into the methodological quackery of some present day originalism. There's lots of hidden moves/assumptions that he exposes while explaining how one could do more honest originalism, if one actually wanted to. An excellent read that originalists will have to reckon with.
It is a tad bananas pants crazy..:
As you have pointed out, Admissions has already changed because of FAIR as students are no longer required to reveal their race or gender. It is quite the data collection problem, which is why you don’t fire the people that collect the data.
