I’m sorry, but “territorial concessions” by any democratic nation protecting their sovereignty and their citizens to any invading army seems kinda nuts, as well as contrary to what our US has always believed.
Why is this on the table at all?
I’m sorry, but “territorial concessions” by any democratic nation protecting their sovereignty and their citizens to any invading army seems kinda nuts, as well as contrary to what our US has always believed.
Why is this on the table at all?
Still waiting to see 'the art' of the deal, make it's appearance. Speaking of which, I haven't even seen any normal 'science' of negotiation either. 🙄
No replies yet