In your opinion, why do some institutions (law firms, corporations) seem to treat EO’s a legally binding (at least from my vantage point)?
I’m thinking of corporations and universities getting rid of DEI or law firms acquiescing to Trump?
Not OP but some possible reasons:
- Institutional governance is sympathetic and looking for an excuse to bend
- Institutions assuming that courts will generally be favorable to Trump
- Lawyers are risk averse and even a lawsuit that ends well can be costly and time-consuming.
Replies
No replies yet