LLMs are not theoretically or practically capable of peer review!
Jase Gehring
@skyjase.bsky.social
405 Followers
952 Following
scientist at UC Berkeley inventing advanced genomic technologies
lover of molecules, user of computers
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=63ZRebIAAAAJ&hl=en
7 Days
Likes
50
Replies
8
Reposts
7
Quotes
0
Top 7 Day Skeets (Avg.)
Likes
9
Replies
1.2
Reposts
1.4
Quotes
0
now there's a title that catches the eye.
paper's based on ESMfold predictions. it's an intriguing idea, but i fear the results may be an artifact of the training data. they may be seeing poor generalization of ESM rather than a biological signal
Ezra Klein argued one reason to end the filibuster is so governing parties face the consequences of their own agendas
Wow they must be using much better LLMs than I’ve seen. Stuff I’ve used isn’t close to being able to do this kind of task
AI enters the grant game, picking winners
Funders test algorithms to spot promising science, raising hopes of faster reviews—and fears of bias
as a scientist, it's my job to figure out how to use the spam machine to cure cancer