this is gonna be what they use as an excuse to round everyone up isn't it
welp
477 Followers
430 Following
Physics BSc. | Hard SF Writer/Worldbuilder | Space Artist | Amateur (hopefully one day professional) Astronomer | They/Them | Opinions my own
Statistics
this is gonna be what they use as an excuse to round everyone up isn't it
welp
"okay cool could you write me a prescription for $500,000 and a functional government please"
Not zero. They impede both radio and optical astronomy (ask how I know!), and the sheer volume of these swarms unnecessarily increases collision hazard. And the price point makes it a hard sell. For many rural folk it's often the only option, making it an effective monopoly. Starlink isn't cheap.
If they did it for electricity they can do it for fiber, surely.
Finally ordered a heater for my secondary mirror, but waiting until it arrives before getting a powersource so I can figure out how I want to integrate it into the scope. Having to go out and manually de-fog makes the photometry I get almost useless. Can't do good science in sub-optimal conditions!
In the case of starlink I'd say they need zero and instead we should be investing heavily in a public fiber network. Megaconstellations in general should be outright banned. Ideally military satellites should also be banned, but I realize that's a fool's errand. But yes, more regulations is a start!
Long-term, payload delivery systems should probably transition to non-rocket systems such as launch loops or skyhooks. Both however require substantial upfront cost and in the case of launch loops a constant stream of power. And both have dramatic failure modes. There are no perfect solutions alas.
Correct. But we can still hand it to the actual talented engineers, from whom he steals all the credit, that managed to accomplish this.
Congress will be back in session next week. Take a few minutes today to urge your members of Congress to support the astronomical sciences! aas.org/action-alert...
#poetry