smpritchard.bsky.social profile picture

S.M. Pritchard

@smpritchard.bsky.social

477 Followers

430 Following

Physics BSc. | Hard SF Writer/Worldbuilder | Space Artist | Amateur (hopefully one day professional) Astronomer | They/Them | Opinions my own

  1. Not zero. They impede both radio and optical astronomy (ask how I know!), and the sheer volume of these swarms unnecessarily increases collision hazard. And the price point makes it a hard sell. For many rural folk it's often the only option, making it an effective monopoly. Starlink isn't cheap.

    1
  2. Finally ordered a heater for my secondary mirror, but waiting until it arrives before getting a powersource so I can figure out how I want to integrate it into the scope. Having to go out and manually de-fog makes the photometry I get almost useless. Can't do good science in sub-optimal conditions!

    0
  3. In the case of starlink I'd say they need zero and instead we should be investing heavily in a public fiber network. Megaconstellations in general should be outright banned. Ideally military satellites should also be banned, but I realize that's a fool's errand. But yes, more regulations is a start!

    1
  4. Long-term, payload delivery systems should probably transition to non-rocket systems such as launch loops or skyhooks. Both however require substantial upfront cost and in the case of launch loops a constant stream of power. And both have dramatic failure modes. There are no perfect solutions alas.

    1