Changing the jobs report to be quarterly instead of monthly doesn't solve the problem of needing to wait for revisions. You can do a monthly jobs report 90 days in arrears to solve that if you want. But putting a report out in April for Q1 will still need to be revised. Weirdos.
The only thing it does is make the volatility spike that occurs around the event much much larger now that it has to account for three months instead of one month. There will be a larger shock load creating larger spikes. This makes it worse.
Replies
-
Plus, it’s illegal!!
