Changing the jobs report to be quarterly instead of monthly doesn't solve the problem of needing to wait for revisions. You can do a monthly jobs report 90 days in arrears to solve that if you want. But putting a report out in April for Q1 will still need to be revised. Weirdos.
But there won’t be revisions to the false data. It’s a more sophisticated version of what they have done for years. Like throwing a rock in the river, more time makes the lie fall deeper into the water as a permanent addition, and the ripples die. They just bought 3 extra months for the deception.
Replies
No replies yet