cringeunworthy.bsky.social profile picture

fen, or so they say 🎉

@cringeunworthy.bsky.social

3967 Followers

760 Following

I only drink hot tap water

death before detransition

recents: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:q5qp3y3psxz3tboetjrslzy4/feed/aaaemefpggguy

bangers: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:q5qp3y3psxz3tboetjrslzy4/feed/aaae7tclsvuh6

  9. gock.city profile picture

    Andrea Gockenhammer @gock.city

    Additional PSA: Firefox has an option for this in its right click context menu. Doesn't work 100% of the time but it does make it easier.

    campfireharve.st profile picture

    Camp @campfireharve.st

    I saw an infographic a couple years ago about how to remove source identifiers from links and why it's important, but I can't find it again and too many people I know are sending me links with them so here's an infographic straight from the oven

    Header text: "HEY YOU! YES YOU! TAKE THIS SHIT OUT OF LINKS!" This is followed by a couple example urls, with a red square highlighting the sections with source identifiers. The rest of the text is as follows: Source identifiers are used to track your activity on a site. Where you came from, what device you use, and even who you talk to. Whether it's written clearly in the url or tied to a random string of characters, it's assigned to your activity. When you send a link containing a source identifier to somebody and they click it, it signals to the website that you two are connected. And that data goes right back to the website operators, and thus their advertisers. Whenever you select "share" or "copy link" on a social app or website, it creates a link like this. If you give even the smallest shit about online privacy, it's important to remove them. Everything after the "?" symbol can be removed without issue, especially sections starting with "si=" or "utm_source="
    0