Head of NASA Sean Duffy intends to destroy a satellite that collects key data on carbon dioxide and plant health, by causing it to burn up in the atmosphere. The U.S. Dept of Agriculture and private agriculture firms use the data to forecast crop yield, drought conditions and more.

The Trump administration has asked NASA staffers to draw up plans to end at least two satellite missions that measure carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, according to current and former NASA employees.

Why a NASA satellite that scientists and farmers rely on may be destroyed on purpose

The Trump administration has asked NASA staffers to draw up plans to end at least two satellite missions that measure carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, according to current and former NASA employees.

Replies

  1. So so so so so dumb. Weโ€™re shooting ourselves in the foot and paying 500 million of the taxpayers dollars to do so

    Wtaf are we doing

    0
  2. That's Our satellite. We The People paid for that! How dare they vaporize our stuff like this.

    I hate this Timeline

    0
  3. "Duffy"

    Says it all.

    Back in the 90ies these characters ended up heads down in the school's toilet in every single US movie.

    Now they are "running" (sic) the country.

    You've made it quite far, America! ๐Ÿคก

    0
  4. I don't know if Rod Serling could have created a tv show with 'characters' as bad as what we have in Washington DC today. Maybe that's what we need. Actors portraying trump, family, & all these supporting characters. Southpark isn't enough.

    1
  5. Canโ€™t NASA scientists just tell him itโ€™s destroyed without doing anything? How would this dweeb know?

    0
  6. Once people have no reliable information, they become dumb and easier to manipulate

    0
  7. Dictators often use food as a weapon. Trump & Putin's buddy Maduro did. They WANT to kill as many people as possible. Through starvation and disease and various other ways. Destroying U.S. farms is part of this.

    0
  8. Trumpโ€™s slashing the space science program budget from $7.33bn to $3.9bn. Unsurprisingly, scientists are leaving - 900 Nasa employees departed in February, with another 1,500 going in July. Trump is too dim to understand the science or the implications. The future is going to be Chinese.

    0
  9. Iโ€™ve said it before and I will say it again every single member of that administration needs to be dragged out into the streets shot and left to rot as a reminder to all people: This is what happens when you fuck around and act like fucking idiots.

    0
  10. Monitoring greenhouse gases is woke. Climate change is a hoax. Regulations that curtail emissions must be reversed. Any scientific info that contradicts their denial of global warming must be eradicated.

    Makes it so much easier to claim it isnโ€™t happening when you canโ€™t be proven wrong.

    0
  11. Is there anything thatโ€™s of benefit to the American people that the Orange one wonโ€™t destroy? Are the other US politicians doing anything about it?

    1
  12. Luckily there's European Space Agency and European Union's joint Copernicus-program with its Sentinel satellites, some of which provide similar information for agriculture.

    Sean Duffy's act of ideological sabotage is in the end futile.

    sentinels.copernicus.eu

    Explore Copernicus Sentinel missions, instruments, data, and technical insights. Your go-to source for efficient access and up-to-date information.

    Explore Copernicus satellite missions - Sentinel Online

    Explore Copernicus Sentinel missions, instruments, data, and technical insights. Your go-to source for efficient access and up-to-date information.

    0
  13. Destroying a satellite that provides critical data on carbon dioxide and plant health is short-sighted and jeopardizes our ability to monitor environmental changes and protect agriculture.

    0
  14. So this is about privatization again, right? "Last week, NASA announced it will consider proposals from private companies and universities that are willing to take on the cost of maintaining the device"

    1
  15. THEY'RE TRYING TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT AWAY FROM EPSTEIN!!!!!!!

    THEY'RE TRYING TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT AWAY FROM EPSTEIN!!!!!!!

    THEY'RE TRYING TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT AWAY FROM EPSTEIN!!!!!!!

    THEY'RE TRYING TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT AWAY FROM EPSTEIN!!!!!!!

    0
  16. TIME FOR ALL WHO CARE TO SPEAK UP - AND FORCEFULLY!

    NO MORE NICETIES!

    CALL IT WHAT IT IS!

    GET ANGRY!

    GET MOTIVATED!

    TELL THEM #ENOUGHISENOUGH!

    FUCK NARCISSISTIC TRUMP!!

    FUCK ICE!

    FUCK THE GOP!

    FUCK THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY!

    FUCK THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION!

    AND FUCK ALL WHO SUPPORT ANY OF THEM!

    0
  17. The Trump administration wants to deny the world information on climate change and global warming.

    0
  18. NASA should do what Mel Brooks does. Tells them the thing they don't like is gone, they'll never see it again - and then do nothing.

    2
  19. What a massive waste of our money & the labor of the many people who built that satellite & put it in orbit.

    Not to mention, Sean Duffy is destroying a satellite will create a ton of space junk and is a terrible loss to science.

    The Trump Administration spokesman is the Anti-Science.

    These people

    0
  20. As worrying as it is, the US will just be sidelined. They're making themselves an irrelevance in the world of science.

    0
  21. You can't deal with stupid. Seems to me that red state farmers will be hurt by the administration they voted for.

    0
  22. That's ok because they're also bankrupting farms, so farmers won't need the info anymore.

    ๐Ÿคฌ๐Ÿคฌ๐Ÿคฌ๐Ÿคฌ๐Ÿคฌ

    0
  23. Destruction of Federal property is a crime. We paid for this. I want him charged and imprisoned when we depose the regime

    0
  24. What is really going on here? These satellites also show what is being grown like drugs. Closing them down means we no longer know the operations of the ocgs. But the Russian Mafia is an arm of the Russian state. Don is also acting like a Don. Are we looking at a carve up of the world?

    0
  25. The fact thatโ€™s itโ€™s unclear why the Trump administration wants to destroy these satellites should be reason enough for every American to oppose this

    0
  26. Does anyone know how I can contact NASA and just buy the thing? Iโ€™ll collect the data and sell to those that need it (read - the entire agricultural industry) and take all the profit to buy myself a few senators and/or SCOTUS members. If you know any billionaires HMU.

    1
  27. First they fire the independent economists and scientist, now they destroy the equipment already paid. Destroying the foundations of American power and prosperity and now salting the earth

    0
  28. It is unclear why the Trump administration seeks to end the missions. <

    Because, just like children who believe covering their eyes makes them invisible, this administration believes eliminating data eliminates problems.

    See also: Covid testing, gun crime research, etc.

    6
  29. I was wondering if this was an already-at-end-of-life issue with the satellites, but it appears they still have at least three more years of service left, so: what the fuck

    1
  30. Fox News is unlikely to give this story much airtime, but it ought to be repeated by newspapers and media broadcasting throughout America's agricultural regions.

    0
  31. to be fair, the article itself states NASA said the satellite could be used "for 3 more years", which would take us to 2026, which is the earliest it would be destroyed. now, destroyed and replaced would make more sense....

    0
  32. "It is unclear why the Trump administration seeks to end the missions."

    Oh I think it's pretty clear: they're dumb chuds who want to dismantle and destroy anything the Federal government does that makes life better for people other than billionaires.

    1
  33. There are countless absurd examples, including this and his canceling of the Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities, that show Trump has no problem tearing up anyoneโ€™s lives - here itโ€™s farmers - so he can win what he sees as political points.

    0