There are two basic problems with these statistical analyses:

  1. Statistically, they are treating each state/county that shifted as "independent" events. They're not. There are correlations between the events. Swing voters in NV and OH are both motivated by the same issues.

1

When correlation is factored in, the "impossible" becomes "likely". One guy, when confronted with this said, "Yeah, but the math is easier to understand if you treat them independently".

Replies

    1. They don't understand a basic statistical law. That election results were noisy at first and then just converged at certain levels isn't evidence of an algorithm: It's evidence of "Law of Large Numbers".
      This guy did a beautiful job of dissecting it.
      bsky.app/profile/trev...

    1