the voting rights act is, in its entirety, obviously constitutional under the 15th amendment, which gives congress broad and proactive authority to stop racial discrimination in voting. and you know it is obviously constitutional because roberts has had to invent entire new doctrines to gut it.

The Supreme Court knocked down one of the two pillars of the Voting Rights Act in 2013 in the Shelby County case. It has now gone out of its way to consider whether it should knock down the other, by rescheduling arguments in a case it could have resolved in June under existing precedent.

Replies

  1. It’s worth remembering that the enabling clauses of the 14th and 15th amendment (and the other votings rights amendments like women’s suffrage and poll taxes) gives Congress the power to enforce it by “appropriate” legislation. Not “necessary” like the N&P clause. Just “appropriate.”

    1
  2. That they're taking this up now is no accident. They want the VRA completely gone in preparation for the '26 mid-terms.

    0
  3. One things these idiots haven't figured out is their voting restrictions are impacting the uneducated MAGA base more than it impacts Democrats. They developed these tactics back when rich uptown whites voted GOP and the poor voted Democrat. Redistricting we must fight fire with fire.

    0
  4. Chief Justice Roberts has hated the idea of letting people of color vote for decades, and strained to get Republicans elected. He’s had to rewrite the Constitution and invent meanings for words to do it, of late.

    1
  5. It’s the old discrimination against white people if you consider Black people in voting ! They are using it to gut VRA!

    0
  6. The 13th, 14th and 15th amendment were won in the blood of 5% of the US population at the time and they had to be fought for for a century afterwards to actually be enforced. Let's hope they don't have to be won again so dearly...

    0
  7. Will anyone ask them to look at the wrongness of the assumptions they made about the behavior of states would be post Shelby?

    0
  8. Democracy dies with the enthusiastic approval of the people. It’s VERY hard to imagine any of this crap happening if American voters simply DIDN’T vote for the obvious Nazi party in both 2016 and 2024.

    0
  9. Friendly amendment: Roberts isn't just inventing new doctrines to gut the Voting Rights Act. He introduces FACTS not before the Court in the opinions. He keeps declaring racism "over" with no evidence in the official case record to support that conclusion.

    0
  10. Reminds me how long this slow-motion crisis has been rolling. Shelby allowed Texas et al to go wild with roadblocks to voting, removing the "preclearance" requirement of former Jim Crow states to change voting access.

    So few heard us screaming in 2013.

    0
  11. You gotta admit, the doctrine of "congress is a smol bean who was emotionally blackmailed into passing this" is impressive thinking.

    0
  12. rialmi.bsky.social profile picture

    Roberts' initial claim to Republican fame was writing a memo for Reagan's DOJ, outlining how to gut the Voting Rights Act... before he hobnobbed with Roger Stone and took part in the 'stop counting those votes!!' riot in Miami, after the Bush/Gore election... and here we are. He's succeeded.

    0
  13. John Roberts is easily the worst Chief Justice in the history of the Court, and when you consider Roger Taney, that's saying something.

    0
  14. I wonder if Roberts' seizure disorder is really a medical condition, or a seizure of another kind, as in a political power grab. Short-sighted, doncha think?

    0
  15. "JIC"yall are not old enuff to remember the fmr ADMIN-JOBS of our current"Chief Justice"well,allow me to exegesis,in1984-86,Mr Roberts served as the Gippers'(Reagan Admin)AWHC (Asst.WH Counsel)he made a vow to"RON"that,if he was ever in the position,he would"RIP-OUT(deracinate)"the1964CRA &1965-VRA?

    0
  16. Harmless-looking, normal-looking John Roberts will go down in history as the most craven, malign, duplicitous, immoral Supreme Court Justice ever! He has handed the country over to hateful, voracious MAGAts.

    1
  17. It's a shame that the constitution has no real content and you guys decided it says only what the supreme court says it does, regardless of the actual text.

    Might have been a bit of a mistake, that. Might want to correct that when you're writing a new constitution after the Wars.

    2
  18. I don't call him Judge Roberts, I call him Fascist Roberts along with the other 5 of them because they are not judges in the sense that they do what a judge should do, they are fascist enablers.

    0
  19. This Supreme Court Would Rather Do Their Dirty Work For The Republican Party In The Middle Of The Night With No Explanations Or Arguments Using The "Shadow Docket"....

    0
  20. Roberts has done incalculable damage to our country. He’s a disgraceful little racist of a man. And please don’t tell me he’s not a virulent white supremacist. One only need watch his actions.

    0
  21. Bending to Trumps anti DEI arguments and to intentionally continue its political Purge of voters if color’s franchise. Somehow these so called Justices need to be held to account for their anti Constitutional decisions and anti Democracy ones too

    0
  22. Never forget that Robert’s cut his teeth at the DOJ working on ways to limit the scope of or eliminate the VRA. Destroying what remains of it would be the culmination of a career long dream for him Anything else his court can do to reverse Reconstruction is a just a bonus.

    0
  23. The majority of the Supreme Court has lost all credibility. They are partisan hacks who twist the rule of law to make the Heritage Foundation and Project 2025 lawlessness fit with the constitution. We need serious reform and justices with integrity, to both that branch and the confirmation process.

    0
  24. This Supreme Court has intentionally knocked down the Constitution and the laws of America with "doctrines" whose "logic" those who created those laws would not see a true. This is a court that ignores the words, ignores the precedent, and declares night is day and day is night. It is corrupt.

    0
  25. He’s doing all the damage he can before the Democrats gain control again and impeach him.

    Aw, who am I kidding? Just like every other time they are in control, they “take the high road” and nothing happens.

    0
  26. It’s almost like an organization that makes literally incontestable decisions (although, a new law could be passed, before this group kills THAT law) …that then is allowed to be corrupted by monied interests, is a bad idea.

    0
  27. The longer I live the more Marbury vs Madison and the concept of Judicial Review feels like one of the dumbest things in American governance.

    1
  28. congress was contemplating something like pre-clearance in the 1880s! the VRA survived every challenge it faced essentially until a guy with a vendetta against law became chief justice

    11
  29. What is Roberts getting for dismantling American democracy? Money? Sex? Even more power than he already has?.. Hard to understand.

    2
  30. I fully expect them to continue inventing new doctrines out of thin air to a) rubber-stamp all of the GOP’s abuses of power and b) strike down as unconstitutional any law that the ruling class doesn’t like.

    1
  31. How do we remove Roberts from office while keeping Trump from appointing his favorite bail bondsman in his stead?

    0
  32. Rather than dickering over the meaning of the VRA we could introduce proportional representation in multimember districts and solve multiple problems. But idiotic Americans will continue to cling to their 18th century system of government because they need to believe their founders were infallible.

    0
  33. Absolutely infuriating that SCOTUS relied on a tortured reading of the "Congress shall have the power to enforce" clause in 14A in Trump v Anderson but ignored the obvious implication of the same clause in 15A in Shelby County

    1
  34. The ignorant rationale by Roberts in Shelby County was that the Act was no longer needed because racism was dead based on the election of a mixed race President. Seriously!

    2
  35. The original intent of the 15th amendment is whatever the hell six Republican Party operatives in black robes say it is, after a private screening of “Birth of a Nation” in one of their chambers.

    0
  36. I agree, But Robert’s has made it his life work to shred the VRA. He doesn’t have to justify it to anyone. There you are. Ds always relied on following the rules and precedent. And here we are.

    0
  37. Anyone wishing for this joke of a "Supreme" court to stand on precedent should just wish in one hand and shit in the other and see which hand fills up first.

    0
  38. Just once I want somebody to tell Roberts that his "I stopped touching the stove and it doesn't hurt anymore, therefore it's safe to touch the stove again" logic is gibberish to his face.

    0
  39. Not so long ago, conservatives all had their knickers in a twist about "activist judges." Turns out they only disliked activists who disagreed with them. What a surprise!

    0
  40. Roberts leads with hubris and is willing and has often left law far behind, especially in voting cases. scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/cgi/viewcont...

    https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1147&&context=wlulr-online&&sei-redir=1&referer=https%253A%252F%252Fwww.google.com%252Furl%253Fq%253Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fscholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu%252Fcgi%252Fviewcontent.cgi%25253Farticle%25253D1147%252526context%25253Dwlulr-online%2526sa%253DU%2526sqi%253D2%2526ved%253D2ahUKEwi_x8vD6-yOAxWQmSYFHam6DLQQFnoECCMQAQ%2526usg%253DAOvVaw1A2b7seOTcF-DB6GxW7Mpf#search=%22https%3A%2F%2Fscholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu%2Fcgi%2Fviewcontent.cgi%3Farticle%3D1147%26context%3Dwlulr-online%22

    2
  41. You forget Roberts gets to decide what “constitutional” means under whatever spurious argument suits the outcome the Federalist Society deems fit for America.

    0
  42. these people must be chased out of their lifetime appointments as soon as possible. It is not enough to pack the court, these judges who kowtow to a wannabe tyrant must be prosecuted and tossed in jail

    2
  43. The trump court will do whatever it takes to keep their side in power. They have shown us over and over they do not act in good faith.

    0
  44. If it is unconstitutional to draw a district for minorities, then why isn't unconstitutional to draw districts dividing minorities communities for the benefit of white folks.

    Unfortunately, I think we are going to land on it is constitutional if you have the power to do it.

    1
  45. The dumbest angle was the VRA was unconstitutional since it’s obsolete. The entire underlying premise of originalism is there is no obsolescence in con law. They literally rejected their very premise of their own school of thought to rule against the VRA.

    1
  46. In a country that will soon be majority minority, you’d think these white idiots would realize the vra will be their protection in a relatively short time frame.

    1
  47. The Constitution-free legal thinking long predates Roberts

    My personal vote for "the case when they just started making things up" was Alden v. Maine (1999) when they abandoned the 11th Amendment and invented a new doctrine of State sovereign immunity

    But surely others have their favorites

    0
  48. “justice for all”? Bah. Roberts has acted to nullify our progress. And to me that is a traitorous act. When he invented the absolute immunity decision, he revealed his myopic intent to empower Trump to be a dictator. Shame on him and those enabling him. Impeach Roberts

    0
  49. Roberts has to pave the way for soldiers to pull Voting-While-Black or Brown people out of line in November 2026. Or his Orange Diety will be impeached for all the crimes Roberts immunized.

    0
  50. The rule of law is a fair-weather concept, it only works with society ostracizing actors undermining it. We stopped doing that.

    0
  51. This section 2 challenge is also an enormous bait and switch. Part of the Shelby Country opinion said "don't worry, there's still setion 2." Now, predictably, they are coming for that too.

    1
  52. Mr. Bouie, it is unconstitutional because it is inconvenient to the Republican Party. Anything inconvenient to the Republican Party is per se unconstitutional.

    Everyone knows that the vibes of the Constitution mean that the Republicans are supposed to win.

    1
  53. Roberts is quite possibly the worst Chief Justice the US has ever had. Imagine going into a lifetime appointment knowing your goal is to destroy the country

    0
  54. TX new Map can be drawn by any AI:

    “Draw the most racially discriminatory, pro-white race controlling gerrymandered map possible. Ignore VRA prohibitions against packing and cracking non-white races.”

    That’s the MAP Texas!

    TX Republicans are to bend the knee to an algorithm of white nationalism.

    0
  55. Wasn’t this always his intention? I believe there are old interviews where he openly admits being dead set against the Voting Rights Act. He’s been waiting and salivating for this. Wonder what he looks like under his mask…

    1
  56. Behind Roberts's smirk hides a vicious and virulent strain of racism. There's nothing benign about Trump's servile protector

    1
  57. Perhaps obvious to others, an “aha!” moment for me was the realization the Civil Rights Movement was the Second Reconstruction — followed by the realization that Roberts has been determined to undo it. That is his legacy. And we need a Third Reconstruction after Trump.

    0
  58. I wish we could prosecute people for reinventing the law against historical precedents, that seems like a thing we should be allowed to do.

    "You ignored half a century of lawful decisions and legal precedents to do this, clearly violating standing law in the process, therefore..."

    0
  59. It makes my mind explode when people talk about “radical” democrats when the Robert’s Supreme Court has been simply making shit up and calling it law!!!

    0