emailing in a semi-literate manner isn’t a sign of stupidity, it’s another form of rich asshole arrogance because you don’t think you owe anyone coherent thoughts

Replies

  1. Is this why they love having LLMs write emails and posts for them? Because they already never bothered to "write" them in the first place?

    0
  2. This is not new. In grad school, cataloged a professor's trove of Irish police reports from the 1830s. The higher the rank/social status, the worse the handwriting. Lowly beat cops wrote painstakingly clearly. 'You MUST read what I say, serf.' 'Must make it easy for The Boss.'

    0
  3. There also seems to be a thing that if someone is good at science/tech or maths*, it's almost expected that their literacy is poor. All of their genius is hard science, they don't have time or bandwidth for mere soft communication skills, etc.

    *or investing in science/tech

    1
  4. Exactly! “Let them guess what I’m trying to say! I’m too important to bother with spelling, grammar, coherence. That’s a loser’s game.” It’s all part of their sense of entitlement.

    0
  5. had bosses at old jobs write this way -- shortness to show busy-ness, but not enough words to convey a thought/decision and just enough to cause confusion (and extra work) for underlings

    0
  6. The way he wrote has been reminding me all day of a former boss, and you've just put the pieces together for me!

    0
  7. They don't need to worry about being careful to always behave and write professionally for everything work related.

    They don't have to worry about showing they deserve to be there.

    It's such a mark of entitlement.

    0
  8. Anyone else freaking out about all the Kathy Ruemmler emails?? she was Obama's white house counsel at the time she's email buddies, talking policy with Jeff

    1
  9. 💯 I used to have high net worth residential architecture clients—some of the most intelligent and accomplished people—whose cryptic emails of random word strings I had to decipher like I was an archeologist interpreting cave paintings.

    0
  10. I am angered when the speaker expects the listener to tell the story, fill in the blanks, deduce the unspoken antecedents for their pronouns. They just talk about "that guy" who did "the thing" over "there", or just say "you know".

    No. I don't know. I don't know until you tell me.

    0
  11. Rich people have staff who are supposed to anticipate their desires without being told. They are out of the habit of expressing themselves.

    0
  12. That these emails ever existed demonstrates these people have the opsec of newborn kittens, and given how the Swamp works I'd presume Palantir had all these people owned before say Gamergate popped off. Makes me wonder if I need to reinterpret a few things

    0
  13. Add in that a good percentage of these creeps were consistently day drinking or semi-high.

    0
  14. And impossible to quote coherently. Control of what you say after you say it, not before. That's why 🍊💩 has been yammering in fragments and digressions for so many years. Just a little bit of obscured meaning and you evade responsibility for what you've said and anyone being able to hold you to it.

    0
  15. Yeah, this has been a regional manager flex for decades. Tell by looking at him Larry Summers is that kind of dude.

    0
  16. The rich love their symbolism

    If they could hide from the rest of the world and have tiny meetings alone, together, they would

    The ultra wealthy decides who lives and who dies in stuffy meeting rooms that you or I never get to attend

    1
  17. I'm always amazed that people can spend years in education and reach adulthood not knowing or caring how to write/spell properly.

    1
  18. No acolytes ever says WTAF, dude? Too scared to be branded stupid for not understanding their stream of consciousness(?) rantings and becoming the joke at the next get-together.

    0
  19. Yeah i have seen this enough from people at the top. It is not a sign of dyslexia or drugs per se. It is very common and very annoying done by people who think very highly of themselves

    0
  20. Really amazing how much of success in the USA amounts to "habitually offload the work of interpreting, organizing and managing everything onto others"

    2
  21. Unfortunately, the causal direction is clear and one-way. You can't become an oligarch by practicing incoherence.

    On the other hand, there are probably self-help books claiming you can.

    Maybe I need an LLM to translate my e-mails into plutocratese.

    0
  22. Exactly my thoughts. instead of well formed sentences, they type stream of consciousness jargon and expect people to interpret rather than spending the time to write it coherently. entitled

    0
  23. We had a board member who was an old-school billionaire venture capitalist. His nickname was “the sphinx” because he only spoke in 2-word sentences that were at best tangential to the topic at hand. It was up to us to interpret his deep thoughts and put them into action lol

    0
  24. Everyone should read the Mother Jones article “I called every number in Jeffrey Epsteins little black book”. It appears Epstein was actually a stupid man he just collected smart people and because he had money and influence in bad places-he could….

    0