Did he hide it?
Was it illegal?
And why are you worried about someone not in government and unlikely to ever be in government
@upandunder2025.bsky.social
33 Followers
38 Following
-
-
He didn’t buy them a company did. Perhaps have a read of the legislation
And even then, the forgetfulness is totally irrelevant
-
Why should there have been such a call
All legal and intended by legislation
-
It is high time the government insisted on asylum seekers working as designated by the government when they are being maintained by the state and waiting for a decision on their status.
The current free ride contributes to the public concerns about the asylum seeker’s and provided dignity
-
And I still defend her right to legally avoid tax but think she is a hypocrite
-
The jury is out on the professional advice.
- Did the advice come from someone who was qualified to give it given the circumstances
- Did she give full disclosure of all the relevant facts to the person giving the advice - if not, it is not professional advice.
- Who gave the advice?
-
Hunt admitted incorrect filing by a company he held a significant shareholding
The disclosed accountant admitted their error in Companies House filing
Hunt had no financial benefit and it was corrected before being reported.
Rayner benefited by 40K and didn’t correct it before being reported
-
He didn’t lie - six days ago she said she was fully compliant
-
Shoosmiths apparently engaged for wealth management
Biggest question is why she gas two primary residences - one for council tax and the other for stamp duty?
-
Whats complicated about paying stamp duty and declaring what your primary residence is
She is either seeking to avoid tax or just thick