Replies

  1. And the people, the dems and the media continue to sit on their duff while the world watches with disgust. Slow clap, ‘land of the free’. You truly are the ‘best’-at being apathetic and self centred.

    0
  2. So hard to deal with. Yeah, there's nothing like 100 seats involved; vote-by-mail is likely 0 seats. But it's just absolute disdain for democracy and a clear effort to end it - which is more important than that he's at least partially, maybe mostly, talking through his (stupid) hat in this instance.

    0
  3. We are losing. And i don't know what to do about it if I can't vote this out.

    0
  4. codewizard.se profile picture

    The free world really needs to break free of its dependence on the USA.

    Soon, the US will no longer be considered part of the free world.

    0
  5. The US is effectively a one party state already. Even when the Democrats obtain power, they refuse to roll back any of the excesses of the GOP. Instead, they come up with more respectable sounding justifications for the same insane policies.

    0
  6. So, for those of us who understand history, critical thinking, and the warning signs of fascism that started 10+ years ago, what the fuck do we do?

    Mostly asking out of desperation at this point. It’s bleak out here, fam.

    0
  7. .....huh. I think he's fucking himself over again. Texas is a purple state and they think they just gained 5 seats. I'm not sure they are right. He's just an idiot in delulu land.

    0
  8. The Trump family has committed so much crime in the first 8 months alone of this presidency that they have no choice but to steal the House. They’ll find some equivalent way of stealing ‘28 too.

    1
  9. Even if the president can't legally influence how states run their elections, what about the president's ability to influence USPS? Couldn't USPS be manipulated so that it is unwilling to handle election mail, subjects ballots to inspections or delays, etc.

    0
  10. This is no surprise. We always knew if he got into power, he and the party would take over for good. It was clear for a decade. We are a dictatorship already. They have control of EVERYTHING.

    0
  11. I think we are now entering the dawn of authoritarianism in the world, we all will be required to work for nothing so the ultra wealthy can make more and more.

    1
  12. He always says what he's gonna do, and of course, the people who should be alarmed stand quietly in the background until it happens

    0
  13. The Civil War losers are whining again. There aren’t 100 seats to be had. And California could easily pick up 10, not 5 that they are looking at.

    0
  14. A 100 seats more, NOT because more people vote for the Republican party, but because it will be made that hard for that many Democrat voters to cast their vote. To use their constitunial right to vote.

    0
  15. yeah, that they're not gonna get away with it. Our fathers and grandfathers fought fascism overseas. To think we would let them get away with is foolishness.

    1
  16. I think it's already a one party state. Only a revolution can stop this and if that was feasible, it would already have started by now.

    0
  17. If a majority of the population has not representation, they are likely to take that very, very, very badly.

    And may try to address it one way or another.

    0
  18. Well i mean the FANTASIZING about it is happening right in front of us! It's all brazen and outrageous but anyone who knows anything about how this works knows that "100 seats" is so absurd as to not be worth mentioning. All of this is a vain attempt to lose somewhat FEWER seats.

    1
  19. Democratic states need to respond NOW, gerrymander, build militias,take action beyond the protests that are only effective in a democracy. If Trump wins there will be no more Canada or Mexico, no more social net,no more rights, only a police state focused on more wealth for Trump and his oligarchs

    0
  20. This is why I wish CA had not said, "we're going to offset anything TX does," and instead played the GOP game of, "We're going to make all the gains we can, be it 5, 10, 25, etc."

    0
  21. Exactly! They plan to turn us into Russia, elections only to stroke the egos of those who repeatedly “win”. All hands on deck to fight the take over of our votes!

    0
  22. He’s just lashing out to get attention. I understand the president should never actually talk like this, but there is no chance in hell he can actually gain 100 seats unless he literally kicks out the Pacific Coast off of the United States

    0
  23. The Feds cannot ban mail in voting.

    The States have sole determination on how to conduct elections.

    Trump can get stuffed.

    0
  24. Didn’t think in the Fall of 1982 when taking a history course at the University of Kansas titled, “China Since 1949”, that it would be a useful guide of U.S. internal politics, but here we are 43 years later.

    0
  25. Democrats need to run in these “new” districts as Republicans. Was done by at several people over the last few elections who ran as Dems then changed parties shortly after being sworn in.

    0