Why do they all talk about bland restaurant chains changing logos like they're Winston Churchill standing before Parliament in May 1940? It's a little unbecoming.

Replies

  1. I would like to apologize to the CB Marketing Team. Your commercials are working - I have been craving pancakes for a while.

    Problem being, now it is some sort of political statement about being woke, or not woke, or some other stupid shit. I just wanted some pancakes. Now look at me. Pancakeless.

    0
  2. Because they’re mad that Target is disproving their “woke = broke” rhetoric and and are desperate to prove the inverse lest corporate America catch on to the fact that trending right is economically unsustainable, which it is.

    0
  3. I dont like the simplified logo either, but I dont understand how it's "woke" at all? The right has used that word so much that it's lost all meaning within their context

    0
  4. why do you guys keep doing this? cracker barrel and right-wing money-grabbers are making bank because people refuse to shut the hell up about a stupid logo and interior design change. STOP platforming these assholes.

    0
  5. This isn't really about the logo though. Cracker Barrel has gone from a chain that fired people for being gay 20 years ago, to refusing to drop their DEI program, offering (gasp) plant-based meal options, and actually fairly loudly supporting pride celebrations. The Magats can't have that.

    6
  6. erocy.world profile picture

    imagine being this guy’s wife or kids. fatal levels of embarrassment and cringe

    2
  7. it's so dumb.

    The new logo is shitty, but uh... it's not woke? it's just bland and shitty as is the modern trend for logo rebrands, to make them "company name in a bland font on a solid background" to drain all individuality or uniqueness out of them.

    that's right-wing, not woke. we don't want it.

    0
  8. At some wingnut sites I lurk at they are going apeballs over this.

    Multiple outraged posts with many more comments — all trying neg CB.

    A lot pointing out the CEO isn't a White male.

    Some even commenting on her name ending in a vowel.

    1
  9. For me, the recantation and then redoubled zeal in this one’s spittle-flecked exhortation evokes the Stalinism of the time.

    0
  10. If Trump comes and arrests all their illegal immigrant employees, Cracker Barrel will probably go out of business entirely, so the local Ku Klux Klan groups would have to find new event rooms to rent.

    0
  11. The far right continues to amp themselves up for a civil war against anyone "woke", which can be anyone other than them. Even Cracker Barrel can be the enemy.

    They are waging a cold civil war as we speak.

    Anything to pwn the libz

    0
  12. Those who screamed their support of 'Freedom', seem to have lost their way. They all want enforced conformity, the hive mind, punishment of individual thought or opinion. "Hypocrisy, thy name is MAGA!"

    0
  13. I don't like the new logo; I prefer a picture with character to oversimplified corporate blandness, and if the old one was racist or something then I haven't heard about it. But because I don't really care that much, I'm going to support the change now out of spite.

    0
  14. Must be quite a life for these guys to have so much free time that they can occupy it with worrying about shit like “whether the new Cracker Barrel logo is conservative enough”

    1
  15. Rufie didn’t hear about companies that dropped diversity are losing points and dollars, bigly. We have seen what the six months did. He should stop being hysterical and read some real figures.

    0
  16. Hey Rufo, just maybe they are making a private business decision to ensure their stockholders and employees are taken care of, it's just business you losers. Don't like it go somewhere else to eat.

    0
  17. This is what it’s about for them—a need for coercion and control. Yes, it’s absurd. From casting choices to children’s movies to crushing last century’s human development. The people saying laughably idiotic things for the last 20 years on the internet now control the government.

    0
  18. It's crazy because this is obvious new management tom-foolery. This kind of thing is not new at all. Company leadership does this crap all the time. To think it is woke, is crazy. How is removing the old dude sitting and leaning on a barrell woke? Somebody explain it to me.

    0
  19. Alt take: let them obsess about this, in fact, encourage it. Troll them about it. Gloat. Stoke the outrage. Tell them we are coming for Olive Garden next. It’s kind of entertaining.

    0
  20. These people think Cracker Barrel is woke and the only thing I remember about them is racial and LGBT discrimination. Is the right wing gonna freak about about Chick Fil A and Hobby Lobby next?

    0
  21. Because changing a logo is an easy distraction for maga/low IQ voters. They should be big mad about the price hikes on their meals and gift store items that will be occurring due to tariffs but “look over here at this woke sign”

    0
  22. Jfc this is the stupidest thing I’ve read in a long time. Nobody cares. The people that go to Cracker Barrel especially dgaf cuz that’s just where they go, and will continue to do so. Goddamnit

    1
  23. Rufo is the guy the NYT was afraid would “scoop them” a few weeks ago about Mamdani. This guy. Who is melting down over the Cracker Barrel logo. That’s who they were afraid of. How embarrassing.

    0
  24. Never really considered that place to be a source of wokeness, but hey, anything’s possible when you sell horehound candy..

    0
  25. Shouldn’t all that performative manufactured outrage get tiring? What small horrible hateful lives magats must live. If they weren’t such awful examples of humanity I’d be inclined to pity them.

    0
  26. Because it has the word cracker in it, it's popular with boomers, and was sued for discrimination. They love all of these things and are pissed cracker barrel is trying to shed that image.

    0
  27. I notice all the words like 'considering', 'might appear to be' -- like, don't you even THINK about doing ANYthing that might REMOTELY seem to anyone to be WOKE.

    These guys are so militant about appearances, they're stomping on shadows thinking they're killing something.

    0
  28. This is the paranoid little activist prick who created the Critical Race Theory panic, knowing full well it was a lie.

    0
  29. Every time these freaks do one of these things I’m just constantly like why do we care? Why do we fucking care about this? This is what you wanna do with your one shot at existence on this mortal plane

    0
  30. Bros will type shit like this in response to Cracker Barrel becoming “woke” but will struggle to write a one page essay to pass their classes

    0
  31. "We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills... for the Vlasic Pickles Stork."

    Vlasic Pickes mascot is a stork.
    0
  32. I think it’s because of the news about the Target CEO stepping down. Target’s boycott was about legit injustice and it’s working. These idiots don’t understand why or how boycotts work, so they saw a typical bland corporate rebrand and cried “WOKE!” as an excuse to do a boycott too. They’re losers.

    0
  33. Because they Thought they were MAGA chains, where MAGA liked to eat, because MAGA thought they were racist & homophobic... Just think what would happen if Chic Fila started selling vegetarian breasts?

    0
  34. Because their mentality is heavily based on an “us or them” signal system. Changing the logo is viewed as a signal of being “one of them” instead of “one of us” and so is deemed an enemy. It’s also why they’ll lose it over a rainbow on a beer can, or a single ad. One slip up, you are “one of them”

    0
  35. It all boils down to "Change without my consent is wrong, no matter who does it, and all things I don't like are BAD and all bad things are "WOKE/Political Correctness/Liberalism"

    0
  36. Sadly - these “bland chains” are all maga know

    … and it’s why they are pissed and a movement. The “fly over “ has nothing of their own anymore - all franchises and prefab glass office building and strip malls. They chose to kill their local stuff and patronize based on ads and now are angry

    0
  37. So, does this mean MAGA will cancel Cracker Barrel and there will be no more conservative masses eating at Cracker Barrel? Don't threaten me with a good time.

    0
  38. I think there's a pretty low risk of Cracker Barrel becoming too "woke". And how is it woke to remove old Uncle Dan from their logo? Must all logos include old white guys to please MAGA?

    0
  39. At this point, I think it's just complete emotional negative reaction to change in and of itself.

    I find the new logo kind of bland but who the fuck cares?

    0
  40. "Massive pressure against companies that are 'considering' any move that 'might appear' to be "wokification" - Go woke, go broke"?? What are they on about? "The Barrel" is not "going woke" (whatever that means) they are modernizing, because they haven't updated their decor or branding for 50 years!

    0
  41. imagine surviving the great depression
    and d-day
    just so your grandson could declare war
    on cracker barrel logos.
    — author

    1
  42. Oh, look! It’s Chris Rufo, Head Turnip at the Claremont Institute trying to get another byline in the NYT.

    0
  43. I don’t know a single non-MAGA that eats at Cracker Barrel. Literally, not a one.

    0
  44. Bland is right! How do they not realize that Cracker Barrel is BAD down-home food! I was so excited to eat there my first time, and it will probably be my last—you can get better biscuits & tastier sausage from the freezer section of your grocery store.

    0
  45. Dollars to donuts his stenographers at the New York Times take up the banner on this within the week.

    0
  46. I’ve heard local politicians tell stories about angry constituents yelling at them and demanding they do something because the grocery store changed the layout of its aisles. This is exactly like that, but for national politics.

    0
  47. I realized last week after seeing a CGI show tie in with the recent Little Mermaid that the right does this because all they have is violence. The left has money so brands are going to keep making things that people like me will put on for our daughters, unless there are enough death threats

    0
  48. They aren't that smart. Rufo fancies himself as a scion of right wing intellectualism but he's clearly a fucking dumbass

    0
  49. Me, tears in my eyes: once more into the breach dear friends, we shall break the will of Mott’s Applesauce until they meet our demands of not being woke and also not being an applesauce company

    7
  50. And, if Cracker Barrel falls before the Woke-Nazis… I know that in God’s good time, Chick-fil-A in all its power and might… shall step forth to our rescue

    0
  51. FFS, man. I've been through three rebrands with two companies in the last six years of my career. This isn't about politics, it's about growing a business and making money for shareholders, something Republicans cared more about before killing DEI and rolling out fascism became their priorities.

    0
  52. Their new rallying cry "Break the barrel! Spill the crackers!"

    "...and then try not to crush too many of the crackers but also don't any of you dare clean them up, that's energy you could be spending on not...woke...ing... !!!!!!"

    0
  53. find someone who cares about you as much as maga cares about…. Restaurant logos? Can we start calling them fucking weird again? And why did we ever stop?

    0
  54. I am going to laugh out loud when I read of Cracker Barrell filing for bankrupcy after losing their core customer base.

    0
  55. I don't love the changes CB has made, but it's very weird to care this much. And the changes seem to be a way to appeal to a wider audience, which is something companies do all the time.

    0
  56. These are the same people who flipped their shit when CB started offering vegetarian meat alternatives. Porcelain figurines pretending to be men.

    0
  57. I had no idea that the controversy was about wokeness. I thought it was just a shitty generic logo that replaced a classic.

    Honestly, I thought all of a sudden everybody started caring about graphic design.

    I'll boycott on the genericness of the logo alone. Not really I don't go there anyway.

    0
  58. Imagine a life so void of meaning that you consider the Cracker Barrel fight as something worth qualifying as a “purpose”?

    0
  59. We shouldn’t share our country with these disgusting creatures anymore. Time to ship all of MAGA to Florida and then call Nancy Pelosi to turn on the Hurricane Machine. Let them drown like rats jumping ship.

    0
  60. He's one of too many right wing lying POS grifters that are also wannabe propagandists trying to keep this going for as long as he can profit off of it:

    In front of a crowd of seemingly robotic looking people, a man on the left half of the image asks, "What offends you now?" and a seemingly robotic looking person wearing a red "Make America Great Again" hat and holding a smartphone on the right half answers with, "They haven't told me yet."
    0
  61. They are looking for triggering distractions for the base so they forget about Epstein.

    0
  62. It's crazy they focus on corporations changing logos or having advertising campaigns dumb but won't ever try to pressure the companies to stop being shitty things which would actually be a benefit.

    0
  63. Too damn funny.... the word "cracker" has been used as a derogatory comment for years describing an uneducated backwoods hillbilly... is anyone surprised that MAGA considers it "their heritage"?

    0
  64. I’ve eaten at Cracker Barrel’s many times over the years and I’ll be damned if I could have told you which of those logos is the new one and which one is the old one.

    MAGA are the dumbest, most offended, whiners I have ever seen in my life.

    And Chris Rufo is King Twatwaffle of MAGA.

    0
  65. No I kind of miss the logo. It shows a person it shows some character. But some some corporate bullshit just took out the character of it. Maybe there is a point not the same point that this man is making but maybe there's something to it

    0
  66. Andover reaction but I can understand the conceit. There are companies that have been many instances where a moralizing few have made things miserable and have sought to censor and expunge things they didn't like. This is probably not one of those cases

    0