Replies

  1. Fuck you. This pathetic description that his blatantly illegal action “pushes the bounds” or caused “a debate” to emerge is the normalization that will destroy this country.

    0
  2. A debate? I don’t think there is a debate. Trump is breaking the law and your org just like so many have fallen to his criminality. Cowards, just god damned cowards. Good job for your cowardly BS, so strong, standing up for the truth.. LOL.

    0
  3. "Founded in 1846, AP today remains the most trusted source of fast, accurate, unbiased news" Doing your best to piss that trust away. If your reporter covers the Alabama statehouse, why is she reporting on what's happening in D.C.?

    Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.

SAFIYAH RIDDLE
Riddle covers the Alabama statehouse with a focus on law enforcement. She is based in Montgomery, Alabama.



The Associated Press is an independent global news organization dedicated to factual reporting. Founded in 1846, AP today remains the most trusted source of fast, accurate, unbiased news in all formats and the essential provider of the technology and services vital to the news business. More than half the world’s population sees AP journalism every day.
    1
  4. You fucking cowards. CALL IT WHAT IT IS!! ILLEGAL.

    Jesus fucking Christ, you should be ashamed to call yourself the press.

    AP - Associates Propaganda.

    Newsflash: we’re not coming back to you when this is over if you don’t do your fucking job.

    0
  5. Well, the fascists are pushing that. The rest of us arent really interested in “debating” direct military rule.

    If you think both-sidesing this issue is part of your job then please quit.

    0
  6. The guy who desperately wants a “peace prize award” ordering the military on its own people for more control over its citizen for political reasons. - yeah right.

    0
  7. Trump is breaking the law and what few norms remain as he consolidates power in his fascist regime.

    I know in the rise of Hitler the mass media responded in like manner. It’s too bad nothing has been learned in 80 years.

    0
  8. Did you just wake up from a decade-long coma? Otherwise there’s no excuse for pretending these actions aren’t part of an ongoing assault against democracy and anything fucking decent.

    0
  9. There is no debate. The law is clear in its intent to prevent exactly this.

    stop sanewashing fascism, AP.

    0
  10. Either AI wrote this, and should never be allowed to again, or the person that wrote this should be fired and never work in journalism again.

    He's breaking the law.

    Repeatedly.

    You know this, and you're lying, or you don't, and you're an idiot.

    Please advise.

    0
  11. Tests the limits

    I need a fact check AP, I need you to in fact check yourself before regurgitating the authoritarian rightwing framework for a clearly illegal action

    0
  12. Oh I see the AP is now part of the Nazi propaganda machine. Even after they humiliated you you're still gonna jump on the bandwagon? Pathetic

    0
  13. Rifles are for intimidation 100% -Handguns are for self defense. This shows the real reason for the presence of these intruders.

    What scenario gives authorization to use a rifle? A riot, a mass attack on them? What does that look like? Auto-fire into the crowd? What use of force policy says this?

    0
  14. A "debate" between the fascists disregarding the rule of law and our Constitution for a demonstration of intimidating oppression for their minority control to protect their corruption and the innocent American people being oppressed and abused in that public display.

    bsky.app/profile/apne...

    0
  15. Stop whitewashing the fact that Donald Trump has deployed the military into American cities in order to stoke fear and crush opposition or protest with this passive language.

    He is violating our civil rights every damn day, eroding democratic norms and trashing the constitution.

    0
  16. As Donald Trump tests the illegal use of military to control Americans on domestic soil, the media works to normalize the concept to ease the transition to full authoritarianism.

    There, fixed it for you @apnews.com.

    0
  17. Absolutely bullshit reporting. He's not "pushing boundaries," he's breaking the law. If it was a Dem, you wouldn't hesitate to say so.

    0
  18. A debate? It's the wrong debate. The debate needs to be over how to reign in a US President who doesn't give a fuck about federal or any other regulations, about the SCOTUS, about norms, about humanity, about anything that doesn't enrich his wallet or ego. Our President is a flat-out dic(k)tator.

    0
  19. tky.io profile picture

    Tim Yocum @tky.io

    As packed trains lumber toward President Trump’s beautiful work-for-freedom facilities, a debate has emerged over whether seats should be provided in the overcrowded cars.

    — The AP, probably, if this behavior continues unchecked

    1
  20. A debate? A debate suggests discussion & input on both sides of an issue, not one side just doing something with zero regard to legality &/or ethics

    0
  21. “Drug cartels push the bounds of operating pharmacies outside of traditional brick and mortar stores…”

    Do you hear how ridiculous you sound?

    0
  22. scohig.bsky.social profile picture

    Equiv•o•cate: use ambiguous language so as to conceal the truth or avoid committing oneself.

    0
  23. Changed my mind, you don't deserve to get back into the WH press room if you're gonna both-sides martial law in the capital city

    0
  24. The Press is selling out the American people and democracy to kiss the ass of a tyrant buffoon. Yall suck.

    0
  25. There’s no debate. Magats want the military to kill as many civilians as possible, and the rest of us aren’t into it.

    Stop giving these elected criminals the benefit of the doubt.

    0
  26. History will judge you. Your grandchildren will be disgusted and ashamed to be descended from people who gleefully normalized fascism. Fuck you.

    0
  27. It’s only a “debate” in our feckless media who are easily manipulated into entertaining these bad faith arguments. Also, DC is not a state.

    0
  28. And when do we start talking about how he's killing tourism with all of this nonsense talk about how crime is so bad

    0
  29. “Pushes the bounds”??

    AP has had the best headlines and some of the best journalism amidst nearly every other major outlet failing, but this verbiage is CNN/NYT tier sane-washing.

    Laws are being broken, call it what it is.

    0
  30. Are bank robbers ‘pushing the bounds’ when they shoot security guards, tellers and customers as they knock over a bank? Or are they egregiously and flagrantly BREAKING THE LAW?

    What are you doing here? Because you’re certainly not doing journalism.

    0
  31. Debate Emerges as Area Man Pushes Bounds of Old Law Against Wearing a Clown Costume While Dumping Bodies in Ravine

    0
  32. This nation is one manufactured 'Reichstag Fire' incident away from having it's 250 year experiment in democracy come to an ignominious end. Drumpf has already overstepped the bounds of military activity on domestic soil. The only "debate" we should be having is how to stop him before its too late.🫤

    0
  33. “Pushes the bounds???” Deploying troops against its own citizens is waaaayy beyond the bounds

    0
  34. It is not ethical to “report both sides” when one side is clearly making up fantasy (eg crime “emergency” when crime rates are down) and the other side respects facts. The AP knows very well that there is no “debate.” I have lost respect for the AP.

    2
  35. A DEBATE? WTF are you doing here AP?

    In my view, this kind of post is HELPING Trump turn the USA into a full on fascist dictatorship with him and his family in charge.

    0
  36. Alright the weasel language of the media is now making shit up. There's no "debate" happening between anyone, one faction is pointing out that this is illegal and the perpetrators are saying nothing

    0
  37. Pushes the bounds instead of 'breaks existing laws and precedents' is an editorial choice AP. Why are you covering up his criminal actions for him?

    0
  38. Americans need to show up in DC and fight. Fuck the military and the president. They're clearly standing against the American People and the American People know how to treat fascists.

    0
  39. What is there to "debate"? It's a law, a 150-yr old law. It's illegal as hell. But the media is so neutered that you bow to the illegal circumvention of it.

    What would you say if this was happening in another country? Say that because it's happening here.

    0
  40. WTF are you talking about? There is no debate. The Military does not belong on the streets of America.

    0
  41. No - no debate is being pushed because we have never had a despot for a US president. This is fascism. Say it clearly or find a new line of work if you can't perform the basics of journalism.

    0
  42. There goes the corporate media again, complicit in normalizing in your face fascism. Disgusting and pathetic. Un-American to it's core.

    1
  43. A debate? Pushes the bounds? Seriously, AP. This is neither helpful nor correct. Practicing unbiased journalism doesn’t (and shouldn’t) mean spouting flatly inaccurate nonsense

    0
  44. There's no debate, 😂. Oh wait, do you mean like there's a debate about climate change, evolution, plate techtonics? That kind of debate, 🤣?

    0
  45. "A debate has emerged" over whether posse comitatus, the law of the land for 150 years, really needs to be obeyed. On the one side, you have 90% of the American public, including 99% of the legal community.

    On the other side, you have Stephen Miller.

    The "debate" has "emerged!"

    0
  46. It’s unreal seeing once legitimate outlets sanewash a madman and both-sides fascism. And for what—“objectivity”?

    MAGA doesn’t do anything in good faith; even Gavin Newsom has realized that after his own failed both-sides experiment. Get with the program, dudes.

    0
  47. Who are the bigger cowards, Democratic leadership, or every political reporter in Washington?

    1
  48. Taking up arms against people on American soil has been tried before. It didn’t end well. (Freshman witness to the shootings by the National Guard of unarmed students at Kent State, May 4, 1970)

    0
  49. Is this what you imagined you'd become in J School, "journalists" of the Associated Quisling Press?

    FYI, making your readers less informed is the opposite of journalism.

    0
  50. Where did that debate emerge from? Were Dems and Rs sitting in a DC cafe debating random statutes over lattes? You’d save a lot of words and ink by just acknowledging the fascism driving all of this.

    0
  51. Seriously. We need to push back hard against shit like this from the media that is meant to help shift public perception on what is acceptable in this country to a more fascist-friendly perspective.

    0
  52. "pushes the bounds of military activity"? You mean engages in unconstitutionally, targeted, racist acts in cities?

    Stop fucking sane-washing his shit.

    Now ask yourself why that law was fucking implemented to behind with and look at how he's fucking violating it now.

    1
  53. Came here in a huff to make a snarky comment about the AP soft pedaling fascism... But, ahhh, I see you beat me to it.

    Thank you fellow bsky'rs ❤️

    0
  54. Do you all ever go home from your job saying it's terrible to run cover for them and I shouldn't be doing this?

    0
  55. no debate. just lawlessness.

    (the lawlessness is often abetted by obtuse dipshits in the media who like to pretend it's not really happening. can't think of a particular example rn, but i'll get back to you when i think of one.)

    0
  56. Stop surrendering in advance. Reporting that a lawbreaker is flagrantly flouting the law doesn’t make you biased, it makes you accurate.

    0
  57. This type of ‘pushing the bounds’ framing by the media is what got us here. Call it what it is - illegal, unconstitutional, unnecessary given crime rates have declined, etc. This administration is manufacturing a crisis.

    The media is complicit in this. You have bent the knee to Trump.

    0
  58. As Fuhrer Adolf Hitler pushes the bounds of military activity on domestic soil, a debate has emerged over a nearly 150-year old law that regulates when federal troops can intervene in state issues.

    1
  59. He is in violation of so many laws I think we should proceed with one big beautiful consumer suit since mass groups of people will be or have been affected negatively by the crimes he committed amd have him arrested immediately

    0
  60. As Donald Trump, who is ineligible to hold elected office per the 14th Amendment, violates the Constitution yet again, the mainstream media yet again tries to whitewash and both sides the issue to give him another free pass to avoid accountability.

    Seriously, do you hear yourselves?

    0
  61. Fascinating that when Trump blatantly breaks the law, y’all pretend he’s not and imply that it’s the people pointing out his lawlessness and corruption who have to defend their stance, or that Trump has a legit stance. He’s breaking laws every day! Say that!

    0
  62. Trump is in Coup d'etat mode. The law has been suspended in his mind. He sees himself as the law, IMO. Stop him.

    0
  63. There is no debate you motherfuckers you live here too take a damn side for the sake of your children what the fuck did you get into journalism for you worthless cowards

    0